What to look for. Not whether the mark is there, which is already counted. Whether it crowds the broker line, whether it is the right one of the two variants for that card, and whether it is legible where it landed.
The variant was measured, not chosen. Each card's own render was sampled where the mark would go, and the one with more contrast won: gold is invisible on navy and the white wordmark is invisible on cream, so a wrong call here is obvious rather than subtle. They are grouped by variant so a run of them can be scanned for one that went the wrong way.
209 cards did NOT get a mark and that is not hidden. 211 attempts were reverted because the mark collided with something already in that corner, a contact line or a handle, and the rest had no usable foot to anchor it to. A card with no mark beats a card with a mark sitting on its own text. Those need the room made by hand and they are a named list, not a vague remainder.
The other half of the rule is still open: 312 cards have no place for the agent's photograph. That is the treatment pass's job rather than this one's, and it has done 191 so far.
The gold mark
195 cardsChosen where the card's foot corner is light. At 150px the stacked lockup resolves its "REAL ESTATE PARTNERS" line; smaller than that it reads as a gold smudge, which is why it is this size and not the 118px the first pass used.
The white wordmark
185 cardsChosen where the foot corner is dark. It is horizontal and nearly five to one, so it sits at 190px rather than 150, and it is the only one of the two that survives a photograph.
